Percentages of the problems faced in the region before ecotourism activities were listed as the lack of transportation in winter months and obligation to use routes through Georgia (86.9 %), education/health problems (52.5 %), power blackouts (24.6 %), insufficiency of income (23 %), insufficiency of village roads (11.5 %), scarcity of livestock and agricultural products (6.6 %), and communication
Table 15.2 Chi-square results of distribution of participants in ecotourism activity according to vocational groups
Source: Aydin (2010) |
Table 15.3 Chi-square results of distribution of participants in ecotourism activity according to educational status groups
Source: Aydin (2010) |
problems (1.6 %); after ecotourism activities, the problems mentioned were the lack of transportation in winter months and obligation to use routes through Georgia (85.2 %), education/health problems (49.2 %), power blackouts and insufficiency of income (9.8 %), and insufficiency of village roads (6.6 %).
H0, which is the significance test of the difference between two matches (Table 15.4), was accepted to test for statistical difference between these values; it was determined with 95 % reliability that there was no difference between the problems faced in the region before and after ecotourism activities (t calculation = 2,497, p > 0.05).
The question “Was the initiation of ecotourism activities effective in the solution of problems faced in your area?” was answered as “yes” by 26.2 % of the villagers, “partially” by 42.6 % of villagers, and “no” by 31.1 % of the villagers.
Table 15.4 t test results for comparison of the problems faced in the region before and after ecotourism activities
Dual differences
95 % matched two-example
reliability Degrees of
Average interval________ freedom Significance
Average SD SE Lower Upper t (df level
Pre-ecotourism 57.016 178.343 22.834 11.34 102.69 2.497 60 0.015
Postecotourism Source: Aydin (2010)
Table 15.5 t test results for comparison of the change in the motives for migration from the country to the village before and after ecotourism activities
Dual differences
95 % matched two-example
Average reliability interval Degrees of Significance
Average SD SE Lower Upper t freedom (df) level
Pre-ecotourism 209.426 630.251 80.695 48.011 370.841 2.595 60 0.012
Post-ecotourism Source: Aydin (2010)